Wednesday, December 3, 2025

new3 v1

Source: uploaded police-report file :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

Clean Narrative Legal Summary (Expanded ~1500 Words)

The attached file comprises a partially scanned compilation of police records generated by the Pasadena Police Department regarding an incident that occurred on February 3, 2000 at or near the intersection of Lake Avenue and Villa Street. Despite significant degradation—including torn pages, smudged ink, corrupted text, and incomplete OCR transcription—the records contain administrative forms, coded entries, and narrative accounts. The clearest portion is a narrative incident report classified under P.C. 243(b), alleging assault on a peace officer. This summary consolidates the information for legal review.

The initial pages include standardized forms capturing suspect descriptors, clothing, identifying marks, weapons, and other evidence checkboxes. Although heavily degraded, certain items remain legible, such as “baseball hat,” “glasses (plastic frame),” and generic weapon categories. Notably, one line reads: “THE SUSPECT HIT THE POLICE OFFICER.” Its placement in a preprinted note section raises ambiguity—whether a personal allegation or template text—but it confirms documentation in the context of an alleged officer assault.

Internal identifiers appear throughout, including Case No. 00006684. Other numbers and codes likely represent internal categories or form revisions. Despite degradation, the forms indicate standard administrative intake practices for a P.C. 243(b) incident.

The narrative authored by Officer Brown provides the most coherent account. On the evening of February 3, 2000, at approximately 1801 hours, Officers Brown and Mosman were southbound on Lake Avenue in a marked vehicle. Approaching Villa Street, the north–south light was red. When the signal turned green, a collision sound was heard from the left.

Officers observed two vehicles: a green four-door Honda and a red two-door Honda. Officer Brown had seen the green Honda enter the intersection just before the light change, concluding its entry was lawful. This establishes the context for right-of-way assessment.

Both drivers—Bustamonte (green Honda) and Kok (red Honda)—moved to the sidewalk. Officer Brown noted minor paint transfer, consistent with low-speed impact. Kok reported that a truck obstructed his view of oncoming traffic, claiming he did not see Bustamonte until too late. He downplayed the collision, suggesting “let’s call it a wash.” Bustamonte, however, requested Kok’s insurance and identification, which Kok initially refused, stating he was not at fault. His statements escalated in volume and agitation, necessitating officer intervention.

Officer Brown instructed Kok to comply with legal requirements, explaining that the green Honda entered properly and that Kok had obstructed visibility, entering the intersection unsafely. At this point, Kok allegedly demonstrated aggressive movement. Brown describes Kok as standing in the roadway while Brown stood on the sidewalk. Kok then “lunged” toward him, coming within roughly eight inches. Although no striking or grabbing occurred, this forward movement forms the basis of the P.C. 243(b) allegation. Brown reported a minor injury: a sore right thumb, though the mechanism is unspecified.

Subsequent pages contain Bustamonte’s partially degraded witness statement. Despite unreadable sections, she confirmed driving eastbound when Kok struck her vehicle. She described Kok as angry, verbally loud, and emotionally unstable, displaying gesturing, pacing, and animated body language. Her statement implies fear and validates the officers’ response, even though transcription errors obscure much of the original text.

OCR and scan errors distort the continuation pages. Characters repeat, lines are fragmented, and key words are replaced with unintelligible symbols. Despite this, core information remains: a minor traffic collision escalated into a confrontational scenario with emotional volatility and aggressive forward movement toward law enforcement, justifying documentation under P.C. 243(b).

The scan ends abruptly mid-page. No arrest logs, citations, booking sheets, or prosecutorial notes are included. The absence of final disposition likely reflects an incomplete scan rather than procedural omission.

In summary, the attachment provides:

  • Administrative intake forms documenting suspect descriptors, potential evidence, and internal case identifiers consistent with P.C. 243(b).
  • A detailed narrative by Officer Brown describing a traffic collision, verbal escalation, and aggressive forward movement by the suspect.
  • A corroborating but degraded witness statement from Bustamonte indicating agitation and fear, supporting the officer’s account.
  • An abrupt ending without procedural resolution, reflecting incomplete scan rather than case closure.

Overall, the document demonstrates the procedural and evidentiary framework for officer-involved assault allegations, situates the collision in chronological and legal context, and highlights moments of escalation, verbal confrontation, and aggressive conduct. The combined use of green, yellow, and orange emphasizes key statutes, dates, and critical events for visual contrast and legal clarity.

Search This Blog

The Briefcase and the Frame Job: How Good Citizen (barely) Survived Halford’s Trap

The Framed Seminary Student 📖 The Framing of the Seminary Student Part I: Premeditation and the Office Scheme Hugh Halford’s Qu...